Welcome to the Common Feedback Portal!

Here, you can report bugs, share feedback, and suggest new ideas to help us improve.

How to submit your feedback:

1. Select the platform you’re providing feedback for: 🌐 Common Web, 🧩 Extension, or 📱 Mobile.

2. Report one bug or feature request at a time for better clarity.

3. Attach screenshots, if possible—they help us resolve issues faster.

4. Include detailed information about your device (e.g., operating system, browser, or wallet version) to assist us in identifying the issue.

Before submitting:

• Check out existing reports to see if your issue or idea has already been noted—we might already be working on it!

• Review the changelog to see recent updates and completed requests.

Thank you for helping us make Common even better!

Bridging fees data are missing

I’ve noticed that the explorer currently only allows users to view the fees for EVM transactions and shielding, but there’s no option to see the bridging fees. This is a significant issue, as it’s unreasonable to expect people to always record the bridging fees separately. Even if they forgetting to do so and later needing to check in the explorer only to find that the information isn’t available is highly inconvenient. A lot people urgently need this for accounting and tax purposes.
In general, a compliance-focused chain should provide all relevant details, including bridging fees, in a comprehensive CSV file. Unfortunately, without this feature, both individuals and companies that depend on accurate accounting will be unable to use Common and zkos. All fees must be clearly visible in the Explorer, especially on a compliance-focused chain. Please prioritize adding a feature that allows all bridging fees to be viewed in the EVM Explorer as soon as possible.

Pauli 3 months ago

1

Extension

Planned

Common security safe

It Should be possible to add an extra layer of security to the common wallet, such as a secondary wallet secured with a different password. This would ensure that even if a hacker took control of a user’s wallet, their funds would still remain secure. For instance, when transferring assets into a private vault for confidentiality, there could be an option to lock access with an additional password. This way, even if the main wallet were breached, the private funds would stay protected and could still be retrieved by the rightful owner. If a hacker compress the wallet, and if common had such a dual-protection system, some would have had the opportunity to restore the wallet and reclaim their private funds. The hacker would have only been able to access the publicly visible tokens. Ultimately, it would be each individual's responsibility to safeguard the vault’s password.

Pauli About 1 month ago

2

Common Web

Planned

Double protection of funds of the users

Is there a possibility of having double protection in the common wallet, such as a second wallet with another password, even if a user lost their wallet to a hacker they will still have their funds safe. I mean, to put your funds in the secret vault for privacy there could be the option of shielding this access by password, this way even if the wallet was hacked the private funds would be protected and could be rescued by the user, I suffered a hack on a cosmos wallet, if there was this double protection there would still be the chance to restore the wallet and recover the private funds, the hacker would only have access to the public tokens. It would be everyone's responsibility to keep the safe's password.

Daniel About 1 month ago

1

Common Web

Moving azero to metamask

I added the new common extension and created a new wallet in it. I have been using the common website for some liquidity pool stuff. Seeing that it was currently mostly empty, I thought to send the ext account a little azero from my Metamask account. The azero network exists on metamask already but there is not currently any azero in there. Since i have been bridging USDC from the metamask wallet. I though to simply reverse the process and bridge a little azero over to the ethereum metamask wallet which i could then use to send to the common app ext wallet. Anyhow here is the screenshot note this is the Mainnet on the app.common.fi website and i wonder if this is normal or something worth mentioning? Note that my account shows 143 azero but as i move the slider the amount doesn't increase above 0.0 even at 100%. Happy Holidays to the team and fantastic work!

canadAzero 3 months ago

1

Common Web